LEAF Battery Survey: Vehicle 269

Report Date	Acquired	Acquired Date	Odometer	Bars	Gids	Ah	City
Dec 05 2012 11:44 AM PST	n/a - Lease	6/2011	15,000	12			San Diego, CA

See this vehicle compared to others in the survey on the battery report chart.

Selected Report Details

Submitted: December 5, 2012, 11:44 AM PST

Vehicle
Survey Vehicle ID	269
Model Year	2011
Manufactured	4/2011
Acquired	6/2011
Level 2 Charger	3.3 kW
Quick Charge Port	Yes
Location
City	San Diego, CA 92130
Country	United States
Battery Pack
Odometer	15,000 mi
Capacity Bars	12
Perceived Range	Significantly less (over 10 miles)
SOC Meter	No
80% Charge	n/a
100% Charge	n/a
Battery Pack Replaced	n/a
Charging
Charge Method	Level 2 Charging Station (208 to 240V)
80% Charge Frequency	Never
100% Charge Frequency	Daily
Top-off Charge Frequency	A few times per week
Parked Charged Frequency	Rarely
Number of Quick Charges	0
Driving
Driving Frequency	Daily
Typical Trip Distance	30 mi
Portion of miles driven on highways and freeways	90%
Typical Freeway Speed	70 mi/hour
Typical Elevation Gain	n/a
Low Battery Warnings	6
Turtle Warnings	0
Battery Drained	0
Ownership Status
Acquired	n/a
Ownership Status	Lease
Date Disposed	n/a
Nissan Battery Report
Report Date	3/2012
Frequent Quick Charging	n/a
Frequent Top-off Charging	n/a
Inefficient Driving	n/a
Parked With High SOC	n/a
Comments
I believe the range has dropped significantly compared to the first 6 months of use. The battery report I got Nissan service was not informative at all. I also believe it wasn't accurate. They don't explain how they measure it. They don't provide an accurate current charge capacity relative to battery rating or when the car was built. I think Nissan is too afraid that people may start claiming the battery warranty issues and they may need to pay up.
Carwings Data

Year	Distance Travelled (mi)	Average Energy Economy (mi/kWh)	Electricity Consumption (kWh)
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018

Nissan LEAF

Toyota RAV4 EV (2002-3)